New Jersey

Nothing About Us Without Us: Community Conversations About Offshore Wind

People’s Action Institute worked with member affiliates New Jersey Resource Project (NJRP) and Maine People’s Resource Center (MPRC) to conduct two deep canvassing projects focused on building community support for offshore wind power development. In the Spring and early Summer of 2024, canvassers from these organizations held conversations with over 1,400 local residents in Lacey Township, NJ and the Midcoast region of Maine combined.

Against the Wind: A Map of the Anti-Offshore Wind Network in the Eastern United States

Fossil fuel interests are working with climate denial think tanks and community groups to obstruct offshore wind projects. These community groups have made national headlines for their opposition to projects in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. They appear to be new organizations that operate organically and independently, but they often share legal support, personnel, talking points, and financial resources with major organizations that have been blocking climate policy for the last several decades. This resource shows how think tanks in the anti-offshore wind movement have received donations from six fossil fuel-interested donors between 2017 and 2021. Of these donations, $16,278,401 has gone to members of a grassroots-appearing coalition at the center of the movement. As public relations and obstruction specialists actively engage local groups to block offshore wind projects, the climate and environmental justice consequences are dire.

Survey on Community Benefits and an Overview of Community Benefits Plans and Agreements

Local residents can feel dismayed at energy developers. A significant majority of residents in three communities – in New Jersey, Louisiana, and the Navajo Nation – felt developers had not fulfilled promises on previous projects, and that community engagement had been insufficient. The concept of a Community Benefits Plan was positively received – but not universally – in the three communities. Support grew for a CBP following the survey, but skepticism remained. Small business owners and environmental groups were consensus favorites within communities of entities that should participate in a CBP process. There is no consensus on the most important benefits for any community, but actions to improve environmental quality and reduce pollution ranked higher, along with affordable housing requirements and funding for mental health and substance abuse services. Addressing measures of environmental quality was perceived as more important than community-related clean energy expansion.